This piece is intended to enlighten us on the issue of jumping from one bookmaker to the other in a bid to win, whilst we only end up enriching the various companies actually coz we fall for the marketing strategies. I dont intend to promote any of them herein but to let us see beyond the ruse and make informed decisions. there are many bookmakers in town as of now, but lemme use these 3 for illustrative purposes stating few advantages and disadvantages *1XBET*: Fastest cashout, big odds, No bonus on tickets, very wide betting options etc *BETPAWA*: Fast Cashout, relatively smaller odds, very limited betting options compared to other two, very good bonus on tickets with as much as 10% bonus on a 5game-ticket etc *BET9JA*: really Good odds, slow cashout, good bonus on tickets too but not as good Betpawa’s, wider betting options than betpawa but not as much as much 1XBET’s.
*NOTE* The key difference between betpawa and bet9ja bonus is that bet9ja offers 5% bonus on 5games while betpawa offers 10% on the same number of games(betpawa give more bonus for lesser games compared to bet9ja, but 1XBET doesn’t give bonus at all).
I guess you will be quick to say *I prefer the one with the higher bonus blah blah…* Good..Pay attention to the following:
_This is not a guess or hypothetical illustration, u can try it out urself_ As of the time of this Write-up 12pm on 24/04/2018; All the 6games in *England League One* on *home wins* gives the following odds respectively on the 3 bookmakers.
*BET9JA*: 499 odds,
*1XBET*: 722 odds,
*BETPAWA*: 476 odds
Now, proceed to stake 1k on this ticket, you will get the following:
*BET9JA*: 499k+10% bonus = 549k
*1XBET*: 722k without bonus
*BETPAWA*: 476K+10% BONUS = 523k...
I don’t need to tell u now that the one without the bonus happened to give the largest payout, now u knw bonus talk is a camouflage, so if bonus is the main reason for ur frog jumps, think again.
*The bookmaker with the most interesting bonus actually has the least payout.*.. #irony
Another disadvantage of bonus(which u always think is the gig) is that it deceives bettors into piling up more games greedily and decrease ur chances of greens. I have stated this b4 and will state it again, *the actual risk in a ticket is not the size of the odds but the length of the games in it*
If Mr. A has a ticket of 20games with ov0.5 options in all & Mr. B has a ticket of 3games of Home wins in all. Even if Mr. A’s ticket has small odds that seem safe, he is at more risk of loss than Mr. B, coz Mr. A needs 20games to go right whilst Mr. B needs 3games. We leave the rest to God and the Village ppl after 90mins.
*STOP DECIEVING URSELF WITH BONUS MARKETING AND STICK TO WHATEVER BOOKIE U ARE WITH CURRENTLY. IF U MUST SWITCH, ATLEAST LET UR REASON BE LOGICAL.* Switching bookmakers like clothes will not make u win a game u will not win, the options offered by these bookmakers and their payout duration shud be ur focus, the bonuses are good, but they do u more harm than good if u make them ur aim. Forecast ur games and win. Giving Chelsea to win on bet9ja is no different from that of any bookmaker, if it will, it will win, u lost the best coz the game lost, not coz of the bookmaker. When goin for a bookmaker, consider only 3 things as a business-minded individual: 1. How fast do they payout when I win 2. What’s are odd sizes, so that I will not av to pick much games to get desired odds 3. What are the bet options available on this bookmaker, that I can work with to enhance my winning potential.
*WITH RESPECT TO THE AFOREMENTIONED CRITERIA, YOU GET TO NOTICE NO BOOKMAKER IS PERFECT BUT HAS AN ADVANTAGE OVER THE OTHER WHICH U CAN MAKE USE OF PROVIDED U MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS* As for bonus, it’s all marketing strategy to make u load games, bonus is good, but more harm than good to an investor.
*BET RESPONSIBLY OR DON’T BET AT ALL*
No comments:
Post a Comment